Hebrews 8 - A New, Better Covenant
A. Jesus, our heavenly priest.
1. (1-2) A summary of points previously made regarding Jesus as our High Priest.
Now this is the main point of the things we are saying: We have such a High Priest, who is seated at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens, a Minister of the sanctuary and of the true tabernacle which the Lord erected, and not man.
a. This is the main point of the things we are saying: We have a High Priest - Jesus Christ - who ministers for us from a position of all authority in heaven (seated at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty).
b. Who is seated at the right hand of the throne: Additionally, Jesus is seated in heaven, in contrast to the continual service of the priesthood under the Law of Moses.
i. The tabernacle and the temple of the Old Covenant had beautiful furnishings, but no place for the priests to sit down, because their work was never finished. The work of Jesus is finished - He is seated in heaven!
c. Jesus serves in the true tabernacle which the Lord erected, the original made by God, of which the earthly tabernacle was a copy, made by man (Exodus 25:8-9).
i. Some have supposed the true tabernacle to be the Church, or Jesus’ earthly body. But it is best to understand it as the heavenly reality that the earthly tabernacle imitated.
2. (3) Jesus’ priesthood had a sacrifice - and a better sacrifice.
For every high priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices. Therefore it is necessary that this One also have something to offer.
a. Every high priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices: Sacrifice for sin is essential to the concept of priesthood. Jesus, representing a superior priesthood, offered a superior sacrifice. He laid down His own life to atone for sin.
b. It is necessary that this One also have something to offer: Though Jesus never offered a sacrifice according to the Law of Moses, He offered a better sacrifice instead - Himself.
3. (4-5) Jesus’ priesthood had a temple - and a better temple.
For if He were on earth, He would not be a priest, since there are priests who offer the gifts according to the law; who serve the copy and shadow of the heavenly things, as Moses was divinely instructed when he was about to make the tabernacle. For He said, “See that you make all things according to the pattern shown you on the mountain.”
a. If He were on earth, He would not be a priest: Jesus is not qualified to serve in the inferior earthly priesthood. There are priests - plenty of them - who were qualified to serve in the priesthood according to the Law of Moses.
b. Who serve the copy and shadow of the heavenly things: There were plenty of priests who could serve in the copy and shadow on earth. But Jesus is the only One qualified to serve in the superior heavenly priesthood. The earthly service, though it was glorious in the eyes of man, was really only a copy and shadow of the superior heavenly service.
c. Copy and shadow of the heavenly things: Exodus 25:40 makes it clear that what was built on the earth (Moses’ tabernacle) was made according to a pattern which existed in heaven - the pattern which was shown to you [Moses] on the mountain. Therefore, there is a heavenly temple that served as a pattern for the earthly tabernacle and temple. Jesus’ ministry as our High Priest takes place in this heavenly temple, not in the copy and shadow.
i. First century Jews took tremendous pride in the temple, and for good reason: it was a spectacular architectural achievement. However glorious the Jerusalem temple was, it was of man (and mostly built by a corrupt, ungodly man, Herod the Great), and it was nothing compared to the glory of the heavenly temple that Jesus served in.
4. (6) The result: Jesus presides over a superior priesthood, with a better covenant, and better promises.
But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.
a. Jesus has obtained a more excellent ministry: No earthly priest could take away sin the way Jesus did, so Jesus’ ministry is far better than the ministry of the priesthood under the Law of Moses.
b. Mediator of a better covenant: Jesus has mediated for us a better covenant, a covenant of grace, not works, which is guaranteed for us by a cosigner (Hebrews 7:22). It is a covenant marked by believing and receiving instead of by earning and deserving.
c. Which was established on better promises: Jesus has for us better promises. Promises to see us through the most desperate and dark times. Promises that become alive to us through the Spirit of God. Promises of blessing and undeserved favor instead of promises of cursing.
d. Jesus is our Mediator for this greater covenant. Mediator is the ancient Greek word mesites, which means “one who stands in the middle between two people and brings them together.” (Barclay)
i. Moses was the mediator of the Old Covenant, because he “brought the two parties together.” Jesus is the Mediator of the New Covenant, a better covenant, bringing us to God the Father.
5. An overview of covenants through God’s redemptive history.
a. There is an eternal covenant between the members of the Godhead that made possible the salvation of man (Hebrews 13:20).
b. God’s redemptive plan was continued through the covenant He made with Abraham (Genesis 12:1-3).
c. The Mosaic covenant was another step in God’s redemptive plan (Exodus 24:3-8).
d. The Davidic covenant was yet another step in God’s redemptive plan (2 Samuel 7:1-16).
e. But the redemptive plan of God was fulfilled in the New Covenant (Luke 22:14-20).
B. The superiority of the New Covenant.
1. (7) The mere fact that God mentions another covenant is proves that there is something lacking in the Old Covenant.
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second.
a. It’s in the nature of man to come up with things that are “new” but not needed. God isn’t like that. If the first covenant had been faultless, there would have been not need for a second covenant. If God established a New Covenant, it means that there is something lacking in the Old Covenant.
2. (8-12) The New Covenant as it is presented in the Old Testament (quoting from Jeremiah 31:31-34).
Because finding fault with them, He says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah; not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they did not continue in My covenant, and I disregarded them, says the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. None of them shall teach his neighbor, and none his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them. For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more.”
a. Finding fault: In this passage from Jeremiah 31, God shows that there must have been something lacking in the Old Covenant - because a New Covenant is promises. In the days of Jeremiah, that New Covenant was still in the future, because he says “Behold the days are coming.”
i. In its context, Jeremiah’s prophecy probably comes from the days of Josiah’s renewal of the covenant after finding the law (2 Kings 23:3). This renewal was good, but it wasn’t enough, because Jeremiah looks forward to a new covenant.
b. I will make: The Lord makes it plain that this covenant originates with God, not with man. At Sinai, under the Old Covenant, the words were if you (Exodus 19:5), but in the New Covenant, the words are I will.
c. A new covenant: This covenant is truly new, not merely “new and improved” in the way things are marketed to us today. Today, products are said to be “new and improved” when there is no substantial difference in the product. But when God says “new,” He means new.
i. There are two Greek words that can describe the concept of “new.” Neos describes newness as regards to time. Something can be a copy of something else, but if it recently made, it can be called neos. The ancient Greek word kainos (the word used here) describes something that is not only new in reference to time, but is truly new in its quality. It simply isn’t a new reproduction of something old.
d. With the house of Israel and the house of Judah: The New Covenant definitely began with Israel, but did not end with Israel (Matthew 15:24 and Acts 1:8).
e. Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers: This covenant is not like the covenant God made with their fathers. Again, this emphasizes that there is something substantially different about the New Covenant.
f. Because they did not continue in My covenant: The weakness of the Old Covenant was not in the Covenant itself. It was in the weakness and inability of man. The reason the Old Covenant didn’t “work” was because they did not continue in My covenant.
g. I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts: The New Covenant features transformation from within, not regulation through external law.
h. I will be their God, and they shall be My people: The New Covenant also features a greater intimacy with God than what was available under the Old Covenant.
i. Their sins and lawless deeds I will remember no more: The New Covenant offers a true, complete cleansing from sin, different and better than the mere “covering over” of sin in the Old Covenant.
3. (13) The significance of a New Covenant.
In that He says, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
a. He has made the first obsolete: Now that the New Covenant has been inaugurated, the Old Covenant is thereby obsolete.
b. What is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away: The message to these discouraged Jewish Christians, who thought of going back to a more Jewish faith, is clear. They simply can’t go back to an inferior covenant, which is ready to completely vanish away.
i. The system of sacrifice under the Law of Moses soon did vanish away with the coming destruction of the Temple and the Roman destruction of Jerusalem.
Differences Between the New Covenant and the Old Covenant
1. They were instituted at different times. The Old Covenant around 1446 b.c., the New Covenant around 33 a.d.
2. They were instituted at different places. The Old Covenant at Mount Sinai, the New Covenant at Mount Zion.
3. They were spoken in different ways. The Old Covenant was thundered with fear and dread at Mount Sinai (Exodus 19:17-24). Jesus Christ, God the Son, declared the New Covenant with love and grace.
4. They are different in their mediators. Moses mediated the Old Covenant. Jesus is the mediator of the New Covenant.
5. They are different in their subject matter. The Old Covenant demanded a covenant of works. The New Covenant fulfills the covenant of works through the completed work of Jesus.
6. They are different in how they were dedicated. The Old Covenant was dedicated with the blood of animals sprinkled on the people (Exodus 24:5-8). The New Covenant was dedicated with Jesus’ blood spiritually applied to His people.
7. They are different in their priests. The Old Covenant is represented by the priesthood of the Law of Moses and high priests descended from Aaron. The New Covenant has a priesthood of all believers and a High Priest according to the order of Melchizedek.
8. They are different in their sacrifices. The Old Covenant demanded endless repetition of imperfect sacrifices. The New Covenant provides a once and for all, perfect sacrifice of the Son of God Himself.
9. They are different in how and where they were written. The Old Covenant was written by God on tablets of stone. The New Covenant is written by God on the hearts of His people.
10. They are different in their goals. The goal of the Old Covenant was to discover sin, to condemn it, and to set a “fence” around it. The goal of the New Covenant is to declare the love, grace, and mercy of God, and to give repentance, remission of sin, and eternal life.
11. They are different in their practical effect on living. The Old Covenant ends in bondage (through no fault of its own). The New Covenant provides true liberty.
12. They are different in their giving of the Holy Spirit. Under the Old Covenant, God did grant the Holy Spirit, but not in the same way and extent that He is given to believer under the New Covenant.
13. They are different in their idea of the Kingdom of God. Under the Old Covenant, it is mainly seen as the supreme rule of Israel over the nations. Under the New Covenant, it is both a present spiritual reality and a coming literal fact.
14. They are different in their substance. The Old Covenant has vivid shadows. The New Covenant has the reality.
15. They are different in the extent of their administration. The Old Covenant was confined to the descendants of Abraham through Isaac and Jacob according to the flesh. The New Covenant is extended to all nations and races under heaven.
16. They are different in what they actually accomplish. The Old Covenant made nothing perfect. The New Covenant can and will bring in the perfection of God’s people.
17. They are different in their duration. The Old Covenant was designed to be removed. The New Covenant was designed to last forever.
“Let us observe from these things, that the state of the gospel, or of the Church under the New Testament, being accompanied by the highest privileges and advantages that it is capable of in this world, there is a great obligation on all believers unto holiness and fruitfulness in obedience, unto the glory of God; and the heinousness of their sin, by whom this covenant is neglected or despised, is abundantly manifested.” (John Owen)
©2001 David Guzik - No distribution beyond personal use without permission.