
In the days leading up to the fall of Jerusalem (around 586 BC), four officials-Shephatiah, Gedaliah, Jucal, and Pashhur-played roles in monitoring Jeremiah’s prophetic speeches. Jeremiah 38:1 states, Now Shephatiah the son of Mattan, and Gedaliah the son of Pashhur, and Jucal the son of Shelemiah, and Pashhur the son of Malchijah heard the words that Jeremiah was speaking to all the people, saying (v. 1). They served under King Zedekiah, the final king of Judah prior to the Babylonian conquest. Each of these men descended from priestly or influential families, showing how the city’s leadership closely watched Jeremiah, worried that his messages would lower morale and encourage surrender to the Babylonians.
Historically, King Zedekiah ruled from 597 BC to 586 BC. In these last years before the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem, everyone was on edge. Jeremiah’s words, which pointed to Babylon's victory as God’s judgment, contradicted the hopes of Jerusalem’s leaders. These four men felt particularly threatened, fearing that Jeremiah’s message discouraged resistance. They thus sought to bring charges against him and stop him from proclaiming doom to the people.
In Jeremiah 38:2, Jeremiah repeats God’s warning that remaining in Jerusalem will lead to devastating consequences: "Thus says the LORD, 'He who stays in this city will die by the sword and by famine and by pestilence, but he who goes out to the Chaldeans will live and have his own life as booty and stay alive'" (v. 2). The threats of sword, famine, and pestilence were clear signs of siege warfare that the Babylonians would employ. While surrender naturally sounded like treason, Jeremiah insisted that submitting to God’s unfolding plan was the path to preserve life.
This message scandalized many officials because it sounded like betrayal. Yet Jeremiah faithfully relayed what he heard God speak. Jeremiah knew true wisdom lay in following God’s direction-even if it meant going out to the Chaldeans in humility. The Chaldeans, another name for the Babylonians, were instruments of God’s discipline. Resisting them defied God’s direct warning, while surrendering would spare the city from greater bloodshed.
Jeremiah’s statement in verse 3 heralded the inevitable conquest of Jerusalem by King Nebuchadnezzar’s forces: "Thus says the LORD, 'This city will certainly be given into the hand of the army of the king of Babylon and he will capture it'" (v. 3). This prophecy was deeply unsettling, as Jerusalem was the prized city of David, built upon centuries of covenant and worship. Yet its people had strayed, ignoring the warnings of prophets who spoke God’s truth.
Though this was a message of destruction, it served as a wake-up call to return to the LORD in repentance. Faced with seemingly unstoppable Babylonian power, the point was to grasp that God allowed these events as a righteous consequence for Judah’s disobedience. While people hoped for miraculous deliverance, Jeremiah warned that refusing God’s counsel would lead to a total collapse of the city’s defenses.
In desperation, the leaders sought Jeremiah’s death, believing that his pronouncements undermined morale: Then the officials said to the king, "Now let this man be put to death, inasmuch as he is discouraging the men of war who are left in this city and all the people, by speaking such words to them; for this man is not seeking the well-being of this people but rather their harm" (v. 4). They imagined that soldiers and citizens alike would lose the will to resist if they took his words seriously.
Fear can breed harsh responses, and these officials hoped to stifle the prophet’s voice through execution. They failed to understand that Jeremiah did not aim to weaken Judah-rather, he tried to direct them back to God’s path. Yet, the immediate politics overshadowed the spiritual meaning, prompting them to treat God’s prophet as a traitor rather than a guide.
Zedekiah’s answer in Jeremiah 38:5 reveals his weak leadership: So King Zedekiah said, "Behold, he is in your hands; for the king can do nothing against you” (v. 5). Although he occupied the throne at a critical time, he often vacillated under political pressure. Fearing his officials but also uncertain about how to handle Jeremiah, he chose to let them have their way rather than defend the prophet.
This lack of decisive action marked Zedekiah’s reign. He was caught between obeying the prophetic warnings and appeasing his leadership. Unfortunately, by relinquishing Jeremiah, he reinforced the reality in Judah that political survival took precedence over spiritual truth.
Jeremiah 38:6 describes a situation very much like that which Daniel would experience: Then they took Jeremiah and cast him into the cistern of Malchijah the king’s son, which was in the court of the guardhouse; and they let Jeremiah down with ropes. Now in the cistern there was no water but only mud, and Jeremiah sank into the mud (v. 6). The cistern was a pit-like structure used to store water, often deep and lined with mud at the bottom. Without water, it became a prison cell for Jeremiah, and the mud was so thick that he sank, risking starvation and suffocation in that cramped place.
After these events, Babylon would fall to Persia, during which time the prophet Daniel was exiled in Persia. Daniel found favor with the Persian kings throughout his time there, but no with the high-ranking officials. In Daniel 6, the officials devise a plan to have the favored prophet thrown into a pit just like Jeremiah (Daniel 6:16). Even though the king favored Daniel, he still succumbed to the plot of his officials. Similarly, King Zedekiah allows the suffering of one of God's mouth-pieces. God would not forget this. When Jesus came he condemned the behavior of the Pharisees and their ancestors against the prophets:
"Therefore, behold, I am sending you prophets and wise men and scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city, so that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar"
(Matthew 23:34-35).
While God sent prophets knowing full well what would befall them, he also had a plan of perfect justice against those responsible (Revelation 16:5-6). The persecution of these prophets points to the ultimate suffering of Christ in his crucifixion (Matthew 26:67; Matthew 27:28-31, 35).
The grim act against Jeremiah symbolized how far the leaders were willing to go to silence God’s message. By placing Jeremiah in a cistern, they aimed to remove his presence and possibly end his life quietly. It was a dire situation that required divine intervention, just like with Daniel and even Joseph (Daniel 6:22; Genesis 37:23-24).
The next verse shows that God was indeed protecting Jeremiah behind the scenes: But Ebed-melech the Ethiopian, a eunuch, while he was in the king’s palace, heard that they had put Jeremiah into the cistern. Now the king was sitting in the Gate of Benjamin; (v. 7). Ebed-melech was an official serving Zedekiah, identified as Ethiopian, indicating he was from Africa, likely from the region south of Egypt (modern Sudan). His status as a eunuch suggests he served in a court capacity, trusted with palace affairs. Observing the injustice done to Jeremiah, he responded with courage.
In historical terms, Ebed-melech’s presence highlights the diverse makeup of the royal court in Judah. Foreign envoys, servants, and officials sometimes gained positions of influence. Although an outsider by birth, Ebed-melech proved more attuned to justice than many homegrown Judean officials, urging the king to rescue Jeremiah.
Ebed-melech's narrative continues in Jeremiah 38:8: and Ebed-melech went out from the king’s palace and spoke to the king, saying (v. 8). The Gate of Benjamin was a strategic location in northern Jerusalem, leading toward the territory of Benjamin. This gate lay on the northern boundary of the city, signifying a critical entry or exit point. At the time, King Zedekiah sat there, possibly overseeing judicial or administrative matters.
Ebed-melech’s approach demonstrated that he was bold enough to confront the king publicly. He did not wait for a private audience; his concern over Jeremiah’s predicament moved him to take immediate action. His conscience would not allow him to remain silent.
Ebed-melech exposes the grave injustice to the king: "My lord the king, these men have acted wickedly in all that they have done to Jeremiah the prophet whom they have cast into the cistern; and he will die right where he is because of the famine, for there is no more bread in the city" (v. 9). He points out that Jeremiah would likely starve, given the shortage of bread due to the siege. His plea underscores both the cruelty of Jeremiah’s confinement and the urgency for rescue.
Amid the chaos of besieged Jerusalem, bread was extraordinarily scarce. By highlighting the famine, Ebed-melech not only testified to Jeremiah’s plight, but also reminded Zedekiah of the moral responsibility to protect human life, especially someone proclaiming the words of the LORD.
Jeremiah 38:10 states, Then the king commanded Ebed-melech the Ethiopian, saying, "Take thirty men from here under your authority and bring up Jeremiah the prophet from the cistern before he dies" (v. 10). Zedekiah, prompted by Ebed-melech’s petition, ordered a rescue operation. The allocation of thirty men indicates how dangerous and potentially contested the mission could be-there might be opponents loyal to those who wished Jeremiah dead.
This episode highlights God’s sovereignty in preserving His servant. Though Zedekiah was weak-willed, his decree here shows that even under flawed leadership, God can still work for the good of the righteous. Ebed-melech’s intervention can also point us forward to themes in the New Testament, such as the Good Samaritan (Luke 10) who, as an outsider, stepped in to help someone in dire need.
Verse 11 continues, So Ebed-melech took the men under his authority and went into the king’s palace to a place beneath the storeroom and took from there worn-out clothes and worn-out rags and let them down by ropes into the cistern to Jeremiah (v. 11). These old garments served a practical purpose-to protect Jeremiah’s body as they pulled him out. By cushioning the ropes around his armpits, Ebed-melech ensured Jeremiah would not be injured in the rescue process.
The detail about the worn clothes and rags indicates the compassion and forethought of Ebed-melech. He recognized Jeremiah’s physical vulnerability after sinking in the mud and skillfully endeavored to spare him further harm. This small act of attentive kindness resonates with the broader biblical principle of caring for the weak.
The instructions in Jeremiah 38:12 reveal how precarious Jeremiah’s situation was: Then Ebed-melech the Ethiopian said to Jeremiah, "Now put these worn-out clothes and rags under your armpits under the ropes"; and Jeremiah did so (v. 12). Pulling him from the mud without protection would have been physically agonizing and possibly dangerous if the mud held him fast.
This detail further emphasizes Ebed-melech’s heroic compassion. He coached Jeremiah patiently, showing how a single individual’s thoughtful intervention can save a life and encourage the prophet to keep trusting in God despite dire circumstances.
Finally, Jeremiah was removed from the lethal pit: So they pulled Jeremiah up with the ropes and lifted him out of the cistern, and Jeremiah stayed in the court of the guardhouse (v. 13). His relocation to the court of the guardhouse (v. 13), while still a form of detention, was far less life-threatening. This moment marks a turning point, showing that God’s message through Jeremiah would persist despite attempts to silence him.
Even in a pressured environment, divine protection prevailed. Jeremiah’s rescue prefigures God’s ultimate care for those who faithfully serve Him, reminding us that the LORD does not forsake His people in life-threatening trials. Centuries later, Jesus taught that those who speak truth in God’s name-even at great risk-have their reward in heaven (Matthew 5:10-12).
Used with permission from TheBibleSays.com.
You can access the original article here.
The Blue Letter Bible ministry and the BLB Institute hold to the historical, conservative Christian faith, which includes a firm belief in the inerrancy of Scripture. Since the text and audio content provided by BLB represent a range of evangelical traditions, all of the ideas and principles conveyed in the resource materials are not necessarily affirmed, in total, by this ministry.
Loading
Loading
| Interlinear |
| Bibles |
| Cross-Refs |
| Commentaries |
| Dictionaries |
| Miscellaneous |